The portable ones of Apple are the mejorcito of the market.

Although in Colombia we usually “do not swallow point” with the surveys, we like knowing which are the tendencies in the opinion of the people to know if the candidate for whom we are going to vote is well valued or not; or in this case, if the portable computer that we are going to buy for Christmas justifies the expense that we are going to do.

In USA the company of investigation of Markets: SquareTrade has realized a study on satisfaction with portable computers and although it is obvious that every who speaks depending on his sad or happy experiences, is much orientador for those that they do not want to end "knocked down" for buying portable mistaken.

The study includes 30.000 buyers of portable (including the netbook) inside a frame of time of 3 years; time in which a portable one he is already considered to be “an old man“ and hence one presents that another infirmity.

MISTAKES, BAD FUNCTIONING AND ACCIDENTS.

Independently of the mark a portable one can see his useful life affected for the sum of diverse mistakes (Blue Line), malfuncionamiento of the hardware (Red Line) or accidents (Green Line) all this framed inside a space of 3 years from the moment of the buy of the portable one.

MALFUNCIONAMIENTO FOR MARKS.

(Explanatory note: The Mark Asus corresponds to a NetBook for which obviously his performance is not the same that a portable normal one and therefore is explained porqué it is the one that better him has gone).

In contrast to the first graph in which there were adding the technical flaws more the accidents and the bad manipulation of the people, in this second graph, there are observed only the problems of hardware or software that there presents a portable one (that is what it imports for any buyer).
The blue bars show how the portable ones behave after 2 years and the red bars show how they behave after 3 years.

If we observe carefully the marks that more fail they are those who curiously sell more portable bargain sales in Colombia. Anyone would think that it is a marks matter, but it is not like that since if we find out the majority they use the same components and materials, which shows up that this is the reason of the porqué they present more flaws. Simply for the quality of the materials of the hardware is there the reason of which they are portable economic.

CONCLUSION.

How one saw in the explanatory note Asus it does not tell because it corresponds to a Netbook, which leaves Toshiba, Sony and Apple as 3 marks that better they was, obviously also they presented mistakes but they were not so many people like the percentage that Acer, Gateway and HP present. to what does this owe?, again it is observed that it is for the quality of the materials, if in Colombia we complain that the portable ones of Apple are expensive it is because a present reality is not analyzed in the computers that sell here in the country and in the entire world; and the fact is that an Apple computer in spite of being expensive, lasts a lot of more time than an economic computer and not desactualiza so rapid, which in the long run is a money saving, because if we were analyzing all the silver a person would spend with a portable bargain sale in these 3 years in updates of hardware, cleanlinesses of virus and the repairs. in this time space it has spent the same that an Apple portable one costs.

As many people were saying to the beginning not “he eats story”, but if we observe impartially everything what shows this study we realize that the people do not choose a portable one of Apple for nice (because those of other marks also it are) not for fashion, but because he buys something that in fact is worth while.

Linkage: 1 of every 3 Laptops they fail in 3 years for: SquareTrade